1. I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.
2. a) Yes, the EQ is specific, but leaves room for an argument in the sense that the speaker will argue what they think the most important factor is. The eq allows people interested a jump-off point on what to research, providing easy to understand key terms that can be put into a database or search engine.
b)No, the eq, in my opinion, is incorrectly stated (Lack of the third rule) because the conviction comes after the investigation during a hearing perhaps.
c) yes, the question provides a stance from the PoV of the stylist with hairstyles as a keyword for research. The question is short and easy to comprehend.
d) Somewhat, the wording of the question gives the audience a small incentive to investigate the specific jobs of an Anesthesiologist, since chronic pain could be constant a constant dosage of anesthesia could lead to adverse effects on the patient. The question takes a side, that of the patients and is easy to understand... so yes.
3 What is most important in winning an amateur boxing match or contest?
